The following is a common rubric, used for scoring essays; click on the examples button to the left to see student samples of each level.
A-ish-- brilliant and excellent
- scintillating concrete detail, impeccable documentation
- insightful, stunning, erudite commentary
- extracts and elucidates connections
- deep, meaningful analysis
- thought is smooth and fluid
- organization is unfettered and logical
- pedantic approach to mechanics and grammar
- no run-ons, fragments, or clichés
- powerful, applicable, and appropriate vocabulary
- excellent sentence variety/skillful use of transitions
- inconsequential repeats
- has clearly integrated classroom instruction
- none of the “no-no’s” are present
B-ish-- solid and well-done
- developed concrete detail, mostly correct documentation
- insightful commentary, less developed than the “A”
- some in-depth analysis
- thought is mostly smooth with some rough areas
- organization is clear and mostly uncluttered
- some mechanical errors present but not disruptive
- minimal fragments, run-ons, and clichés
- solid vocabulary choices, applies learned vocabulary
- above-average sentence variety/ standard use of transitions
- repeats very little
- has improved on previous errors, some learning obvious
- none of the “no-no’s” are present
C-ish-- adequate with room for improvement
- follows basic format (ratio/ word counts/ sentence layout)
- CD is acceptable, may struggle with documentation
- commentary is generic, obvious, or superficial
- organization is present but has some confusion
- mechanical errors interfere with flow
- run-ons
- fragments
- clichés
- choppy
- basic vocabulary/ weak words
- limited sentence variety
- repeats in words, phrases, ideas are noticeable
- avoids all forms of “I, me, my, mine, you(r) (rs), us, we, ours”
- avoids “would, should, could, probably, if, might, may”
- has not integrated classroom instruction or improved on previous mistakes as hoped
- CD in comm
- uses filler words and phrases
- comm in CD
D-ish-- demonstrates serious problems
- format not followed (ratio/ word counts/ sentence layout)
- weak/inappropriate CDs, serious documentation errors
- CD’s or quotes are not accurate to text
- weak commentary that is off-topic or illogical
- dominated by plot summary
- doesn’t address prompt
- organization is flawed and unclear-- difficult to follow
- comms do not fit BTs and CDs (too generic)
- CDish comm
- COMMish CD
- mechanical errors a serious problem
- simple/inappropriate word choice
- no transitions
- repeats are a serious problem.... repeatedly
- uses ““I, me, my, mine, you, your, yours, us, we, ours, would,
should, could, probably, if, might, may”
- ignores classroom instruction and previous mistakes
- uses filler words and phrases
F: insuff. word counts, missing chunks or paragraphs....